SECURITY
Spam a lot: Spiced ham purveyor fails in trademark bid
06-10-2006
by Silicon.com
Hormel Foods, which owns the trademark for spiced ham food product SPAM, has failed in its attempt to register "spam" as an EU-wide trademark when used to designate unsolicited e-mails.
Hormel attempted to register "spam" as a trademark when used to refer to "services to avoid or suppress unsolicited e-mails", and the "creation and maintenance of computer software; technical consultancy, particularly in combination with network services; and providing of expertise, engineering services and technical consulting services [related to junk e-mail]".
Hormel argued in an appeal to the Office of Harmonisation for the Internal Market (Ohim), the EU trademark body, the general public would not immediately recognise the use of the word "spam" as pertaining to junk e-mail but would instead associate it with "a kind of spicy ham" food product.
Ohim disagreed, and dismissed the appeal. Products aimed at tackling the problem of spam were aimed at IT professionals who would not confuse junk e-mail with the meat product, it maintained.
Also, a Google search returned more hits for "spam" junk e-mail than for the canned meat, which satisfied Ohim that the word was also in use by the general public to refer to unsolicited mail.
The Ohim ruling said: "The most evident meaning of the term SPAM for the consumers of the services at issue will certainly be 'unsolicited usually commercial e-mail sent to a large number of addressees' rather than a designation for canned spicy ham."
Hormel has made several attempts to wrest the name from generic use, including an advertising campaign in 2004, and attempts to invalidate the Spambuster name in the UK High Court in 2005. That court case also failed.
Tom Espiner writes for ZDNet UK.
Reprinted with permission from Silicon.com
Creating successful email surveys: Denise Cox of email specialist Newsweaver argues that you can tap into your readers' likes or dislikes by surveying them.
