ENN - Electric News.net
Free e-mail alerts & newsletter - Sign up here
Free e-mail alerts & newsletter - Sign up here
Edit your alerts
News
   CORRECTIONS
Survey
Let us know how to make ENN better!
Take our reader's survey.
Post a Job

 
Students rebel against IT
Not so long ago students fought tooth and nail to get into IT courses. Now, they are shunning such studies, with massive implications for Ireland's reputation as a high-tech centre.
More here

 

The following e-mail will be sent on your behalf.

 has sent the following story to you from ElectricNews.net.

The story is available from https://electricnews.net/news.html?code=8612780

Firms 'pick-n-mix' anti-virus products
Friday, August 30 2002
by Matthew Clark


Most corporations prefer to deploy anti-virus software on their e-mail server,
but increasingly firms are placing products at multiple points on their network.


In a recent report, UK-based research and marketing firm Frost & Sullivan said
that around 80 percent of firms deploy anti-virus (AV) software on their e-mail
server. Interestingly, however, over 70 percent have also placed malware stoppers
on desktops, and nearly 60 percent have AV e-security products sitting on their
corporate firewall.


These figures suggest that many companies are now electing to place anti-virus
software at multiple points on a network, in order to increase the odds of
intercepting harmful software, noted Frost & Sullivan industry analyst Jose
Lopez.


"Clearly, the optimum solution for end-users appears to be using different
anti-virus products at different parts of the network," Lopez added. "However,
whilst vendors stronger at the desktop such as Network Associates and Symantec
look to upsell server-based solutions, there are obviously also opportunities for
other vendors such as Trend Micro and Sophos to gain a foothold within these
customer bases."

Indeed, the report went on to say that corporations are choosing to roll out
products from different vendors, a strategy viewed as fail-safe. This is because
differing anti-virus software makers have established varying reputations in
terms of how effective their products are in different points on a network.


Moreover, Frost & Sullivan's research said that although corporate security
experts can recognise specific product brands, in many cases they are not aware
of which firm makes which product. "The vast majority of respondents could
provide the name of at least one anti-virus vendor... however, product rather
than vendor brand names enjoyed higher recall among many end-users, with
respondents often confusing the product with the company name," Frost & Sullivan
said.


"This issue was particularly evident in the case of the two main anti-virus
vendors in the market - Network Associates and Symantec," the company added.


Other notable points in the research said many of the large global AV vendors are
now facing "a stiff challenge" from regional vendors, with prominent
competitors such as Panda Software (Spain), Sophos, Message Labs (United
Kingdom), F-Secure (Scandinavia) and Kaspersky Labs (Russia) emerging.


Finally, the report said that in terms of customer perception, 20 percent of
respondents to Frost & Sullivan's survey identified virus detection rates as
being the main selection criteria for anti-virus software products. Time lines,
ease of signature updates and speed of virus detection also featured prominently.
Price was not accorded much importance by end-users, Frost & Sullivan said.



Search

Jobs
The 6th Sedona Conference in Dublin

UTVIP

Aztech

Powered by The CIA

 

© Copyright ElectricNews.Net Ltd 1999-2002.